Diagital Studio

Services

Scope moves. What you get stays honest.

No packages built around headcount, no pricing games. Pick the scope that matches what you actually need: from writing code to owning the whole system, with a team if the work calls for one.

Build

Hands-on development

You already know what needs to be built. I write it: clean, tested, production-ready code on the stack you're already running.

EngagementTask or sprint based
CommunicationAsync updates, PR by PR
  • Feature development on an existing codebase
  • Bug fixes and performance work
  • Code reviews and PR turnaround
  • Integration with your existing services and APIs
  • Test coverage for everything shipped
  • Direct handoff, no management layer in between
Development

Best for: Teams with an architecture and a backlog that needs shipping.

Start a build

Most common

Architect

Architecture & design, then build

I design the system before a line of code is written: data model, service boundaries, infrastructure. Then I build it myself, end to end.

EngagementProject based, kickoff to launch
CommunicationWeekly milestones, direct access to me
  • Everything in Build
  • System architecture & data modeling
  • UI/UX design for the product
  • Infrastructure and scaling decisions made upfront, not patched in later
  • Technical documentation as the system gets built
  • One person owning the product from first commit to launch
ArchitectureDesignDevelopment

Best for: New products or rebuilds that need to be right from the foundation up.

Scope a project

Full ownership

Lead

Architecture, design, and a team to execute it

Same architectural ownership as Architect, but I assemble and lead the team that builds it. You get one accountable owner, not a group chat full of contractors.

EngagementOngoing, dedicated team
CommunicationSprint cadence, I run standups and demos
  • Everything in Architect
  • A team assembled and directed for your project
  • Single point of technical accountability
  • Sprint planning, code review and delivery ownership across the team
  • Hiring and vetting the specific roles the project needs
  • You talk to one person, I manage the rest
ArchitectureDesignDevelopmentTeam leadership

Best for: Larger scope, tighter timelines, or work that needs more hands without losing a single point of accountability.

Talk through scope

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Both. On Build and Architect scopes I do the work myself. On Lead scopes I assemble and personally direct a small team, but you still deal with one person, me, for every decision.